Check your own draft, keep the version trail, and hand a client something concrete when they ask.
3 free checks per day
Scores come from an established third-party detection service, not a homegrown scoring trick.
You get the passages that carry the signal, not one number with no explanation.
Revise flagged passages, rescan with the same detector, and compare what changed.
Every saved version records the result and changes without pretending a score proves authorship.
No single score settles the question, because detectors disagree with each other and all of them misfire. A documented process is the part a reasonable client will actually accept.
Run your draft through the same kind of detector your client is likely to use, so you find out on your schedule rather than theirs.
Revision History saves each version of a draft with its own verified result, so you can show how the piece developed instead of just asserting that it is yours.
Every saved report has a read-only share link. Send that instead of a cropped image nobody has any reason to trust.
Detectors disagree with each other and all of them produce false positives, especially on clean, plainly-written prose. Run your own check, then use the sentence-level report to show which passages were flagged and talk through how you wrote them. A version trail is stronger than any single score.
Detection responds to flattened sentence rhythm, stock phrasing, and predictable structure. Careful, edited, professional writing can hit all three honestly. It is a signal, not proof.
No, and we will not claim otherwise. Nothing can prove authorship from the finished text alone. What a report and a version trail do is document a plausible process, which is usually what a client is really asking for.
Only if originality is already a live question in that relationship. Volunteering one on every project invites a conversation you may not want to start.
Paste it in and see what a detector sees. No card required to start.
Sign up free